Our team has been using a Velodyne 32 LiDAR on both our vehicle and Matrice 600 Pro, and its been performing pretty well. We just did a demo flight for one of our clients and shared some sample data. Last year we scanned over 500 acres in Leavenworth, Washington and have done several other projects across other states. Aerial LiDAR is definitely right on the money..
-
You're one step from joining LiDAR Technology Forum – Mapping, Remote Sensing & 3D Data Analysis.
Create a free account to post, follow threads, and never miss an update. Sign up free →
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Aerial LiDAR ftw!!
- Thread starter anatoly23
- Start date
yeah, you're not wrong. aerial LiDAR is absolutely 'on the money'Our team has been using a Velodyne 32 LiDAR on both our vehicle and Matrice 600 Pro, and its been performing pretty well. We just did a demo flight for one of our clients and shared some sample data. Last year we scanned over 500 acres in Leavenworth, Washington and have done several other projects across other states. Aerial LiDAR is definitely right on the money..
500 acres is wild efficiency! That Velodyne 32 is a fantastic sensor for that scale. Any plans to push into even larger projects?
yellowtangerine4269
New member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2025
- Messages
- 1
Sounds like a solid setup! How's the data quality been in dense canopy areas? And are you syncing it with any imaging for colorized point clouds?
Well that's the goal!!yeah, you're not wrong. aerial LiDAR is absolutely 'on the money'
500 acres is wild efficiency! That Velodyne 32 is a fantastic sensor for that scale. Any plans to push into even larger projects?
Future_File7621
New member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2025
- Messages
- 1
Strong combo right there. great range and point density for large-scale mapping. Curious though, are you running GPS/IMU fusion with post-processing, or sticking to real-time georeferencing?
Thanks! Im using GPS/IMU fusion with post-processing for now to get the best accuracy, but we're exploring realtime georeferencing options for faster results in the field.Strong combo right there. great range and point density for large-scale mapping. Curious though, are you running GPS/IMU fusion with post-processing, or sticking to real-time georeferencing?